RDTE vs. MAGS
RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 25.14% vs 30.89% for MAGS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
RDTE vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 0.83% return.
RDTE
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTE vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 9.93% | 9.46% | 8.81% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.83% | 22.99% | 26.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDTE and MAGS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between RDTE and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
RDTE vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDTE
MAGS
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
RDTE
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Communication Services
RDTE
-
MAGS
Consumer Cyclical
RDTE
-
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Energy
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Healthcare
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Industrials
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Real Estate
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Technology
RDTE
-
MAGS
Utilities
RDTE
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDTE vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
RDTE
MAGS
RDTE vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDTE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.67 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 5.75 | +3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDTE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.49 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
RDTE vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDTE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.32% | -29.91% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -18.62% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -6.24% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -4.70% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 5.38% | -2.74% |
Volatility
RDTE vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) have volatilities of 5.89% and 5.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDTE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 5.94% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 14.85% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 20.47% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 26.00% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 26.00% | -6.67% |
RDTE vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDTE vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.59%, more than MAGS's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.47% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.59% | 50.16% | 10.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDTE and MAGS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to RDTE (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 1-year performance, MAGS leads with 30.89% vs 25.14% for RDTE. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 30.89% return vs 25.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RDTE.
RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 46.59%, compared with 1.47% for MAGS.
RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RDTE and 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDTE and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer