PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTE vs. FOF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RDTE vs. FOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RDTE vs. FOF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than FOF's 1.12% return.


RDTE

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.65%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FOF

1D
2.10%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
1.12%
6M
4.03%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RDTE vs. FOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDTE and FOF have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

RDTE vs. FOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FOF
FOF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. FOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDTEFOFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.92

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.40

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.18

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.68

4.66

+0.02

RDTE vs. FOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the FOF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and FOF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDTEFOFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.92

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.32

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and FOF is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RDTE vs. FOF - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.50%, more than FOF's 7.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDTE
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
51.50%50.16%10.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FOF
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund
7.97%7.91%8.22%9.32%9.99%7.06%8.41%7.78%9.41%7.84%8.90%9.49%

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. FOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum FOF drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and FOF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTEFOFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.32%

-59.38%

+35.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-15.07%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-11.70%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-9.38%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.80%

+0.10%

Volatility

RDTE vs. FOF - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) have volatilities of 6.85% and 6.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RDTEFOFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

6.56%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

11.21%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

18.68%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

18.02%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

20.26%

-0.81%