PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOF vs. STRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOF vs. STRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOF achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than STRC's -1.42% return.


FOF

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-4.86%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
6.89%

STRC

1D
0.52%
1M
2.97%
6M
-2.51%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$558.96K$586.46K$703.32K
$103.85M$114.18M$295.45M

FOF vs. STRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FOF and STRC is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOF vs. STRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOF
FOF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

STRC
STRC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
STRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
STRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOF vs. STRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOFSTRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.33

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

1.81

+0.94

FOF vs. STRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOF Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the STRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOF and STRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOF vs. STRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOF drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than STRC's maximum drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOF and STRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOFSTRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-23.49%

-35.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.07%

-23.49%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-6.63%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-1.92%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

4.25%

+0.83%

Volatility

FOF vs. STRC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) is 3.07%, while Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that FOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOFSTRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

7.15%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

20.47%

-8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

22.25%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

22.22%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

22.22%

-1.88%

Dividends

FOF vs. STRC - Dividend Comparison

FOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, less than STRC's 13.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOF
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund
7.68%7.91%8.22%9.32%9.99%7.06%8.41%7.78%9.41%7.84%8.90%9.49%
STRC
Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock
13.84%4.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOF and STRC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRC has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to FOF (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOF dropped -59.38% vs STRC's -23.49%.

FOF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOF and STRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer