RDOG vs. SDOG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 4.14%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for SDOG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.

Performance

RDOG vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RDOG having a 14.68% return and SDOG slightly higher at 15.26%. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 4.14%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.

RDOG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.37%
• YTD: 14.68%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 4.14%

SDOG

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 6M: 17.58%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 9.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	14.68%	0.95%	4.57%	10.38%	-25.53%	34.42%	-10.01%	21.54%	-5.70%	11.84%
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	15.26%	11.12%	14.70%	4.19%	-0.20%	24.59%	-0.35%	24.02%	-11.43%	12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and SDOG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012	0.65

The correlation between RDOG and SDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDOG vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDOG	SDOG
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.1%
Communication Services	-	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	15.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.8%
Energy	-	9.9%
Financial Services	-	11.0%
Healthcare	-	9.7%
Industrials	-	8.0%
Technology	-	14.1%
Utilities	-	9.4%

Return for Risk

RDOG vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 42
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

SDOG

SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 73
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDOG	SDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.34	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.50	-1.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.41	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	4.28	-2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	13.78	-6.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDOG vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDOG	SDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.34	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.57	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.51	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.66	-0.49

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and SDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDOG	SDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.59%	-43.56%	-24.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-6.24%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-16.00%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.52%	-19.84%	-15.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.35%	-43.56%	-5.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	0.00%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-4.92%	-7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	1.94%	+1.15%

Volatility

RDOG vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.00%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDOG	SDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.00%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	7.89%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	11.37%	+3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.84%	15.42%	+4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.05%	19.06%	+3.99%

RDOG vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDOG vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than SDOG's 3.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.08%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	3.32%	3.68%	3.86%	4.29%	3.87%	3.62%	3.63%	3.37%	4.03%	3.27%	3.32%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDOG and SDOG in my portfolio?

RDOG and SDOG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDOG or SDOG?

RDOG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to SDOG (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, RDOG or SDOG?

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.69% vs 4.14% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDOG or SDOG?

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDOG or SDOG?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDOG or SDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 3.32% for SDOG.

What is the main difference between RDOG and SDOG?

RDOG is categorized as REIT, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.36% for SDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.