RDOG vs. RIGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS).
RDOG and RIGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
RDOG vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDOG vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 0.59% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 2.90%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.30% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDOG vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
RIGS
RDOG vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | 0.60 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.74 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 1.87 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.29 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.43 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.45 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and RIGS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RDOG vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than RIGS's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.94% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and RIGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -15.31% | -52.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -5.18% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -9.03% | -26.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -15.31% | -34.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.38% | -2.15% | -11.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -1.60% | -10.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.05% | +2.10% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.20%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 2.20% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 6.17% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 10.15% | +7.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 7.47% | +12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 7.74% | +15.28% |