RDOG vs. EDOG
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and EDOG (ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while EDOG is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 4.49%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for EDOG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EDOG.
Performance
RDOG vs. EDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than EDOG's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed EDOG with an annualized return of 4.49%, while EDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.34% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
EDOG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
RDOG vs. EDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 1.65% | 22.59% | 1.70% | 11.58% | -10.50% | 11.71% | 7.99% | 13.26% | -16.52% | 20.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and EDOG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.44 |
The correlation between RDOG and EDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. EDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
EDOG
RDOG vs. EDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | EDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.60 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 4.24 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. EDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than EDOG's maximum drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and EDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | EDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -44.29% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -10.73% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -15.29% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -26.54% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -44.29% | -5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -9.54% | +8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -11.20% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 4.05% | -0.95% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. EDOG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) at 4.04%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | EDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 4.04% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 14.23% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 16.05% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 15.42% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 17.42% | +5.63% |
RDOG vs. EDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDOG vs. EDOG - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than EDOG's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 5.06% | 4.50% | 6.55% | 6.53% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 2.60% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 4.55% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and EDOG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDOG has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to EDOG (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs EDOG's -44.29%.
On 10-year performance, EDOG leads with 6.34% vs 4.49% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDOG has performed better with a 6.34% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 5.06% for EDOG.
RDOG is categorized as REIT, while EDOG is Emerging Markets Equities. RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.60% for EDOG.
RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and EDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer