RDIV vs. EPMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. RDIV is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. Over the past year, RDIV returned 27.04% vs 31.44% for EPMV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.

Performance

RDIV vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than EPMV's 18.27% return.

RDIV

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 10.95%

EPMV

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 20.75%
• 1Y: 31.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	11.95%	14.93%
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	18.27%	13.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and EPMV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.68

The correlation between RDIV and EPMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDIV vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDIV	EPMV
Energy	28.8%	5.0%
Financial Services	18.0%	18.1%
Consumer Defensive	15.9%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	12.2%
Real Estate	8.0%	6.4%
Healthcare	7.8%	6.7%
Utilities	6.4%	3.0%
Technology	5.1%	18.7%
Basic Materials	0.5%	6.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Industrials	-	21.7%

Return for Risk

RDIV vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 71
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EPMV

EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 63
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.08	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.04	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.61	3.55	+2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.50	11.73	+4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDIV vs. EPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the EPMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and EPMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.08	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	2.05	-1.50

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. EPMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than EPMV's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and EPMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.97%	-8.78%	-41.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.84%	-8.78%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	0.00%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-1.79%	-4.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	2.66%	-1.01%

Volatility

RDIV vs. EPMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.46%, while Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	5.35%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	11.35%	-2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	15.19%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	15.51%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	15.51%	+6.38%

RDIV vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDIV vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than EPMV's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.66%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDIV and EPMV in my portfolio?

RDIV and EPMV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDIV or EPMV?

EPMV has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to RDIV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs EPMV's -8.78%.

Which ETF is better, RDIV or EPMV?

On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 31.44% vs 27.04% for RDIV. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDIV or EPMV?

Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 31.44% return vs 27.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDIV or EPMV?

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDIV or EPMV?

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.

What is the main difference between RDIV and EPMV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.88% for EPMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.