RDIV vs. EPMV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. RDIV is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. Over the past year, RDIV returned 36.48% vs 25.47% for EPMV. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.

Performance

RDIV vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than EPMV's 18.47% return.

RDIV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 6.60%
• 6M: 17.44%
• YTD: 22.74%
• 1Y: 36.48%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 13.86%
• 10Y*: 11.30%
• ALL TIME*: 11.74%

EPMV

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 11.69%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	$595.15	$435.94	$1.33K
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	$3.34M	$2.84M	$4.35M

RDIV vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	22.74%	16.79%
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	18.47%	14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and EPMV is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.61

The correlation between RDIV and EPMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDIV vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDIV	EPMV
Financial Services	19.2%	20.3%
Energy	17.0%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	15.4%	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	12.0%
Communication Services	8.0%	-
Real Estate	7.6%	7.0%
Healthcare	6.8%	8.7%
Utilities	6.4%	2.8%
Technology	5.1%	17.4%
Basic Materials	0.5%	7.1%
Industrials	-	18.4%

Return for Risk

RDIV vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 95
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EPMV

EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 69
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDIV vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.54	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	2.27	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.24	2.71	+4.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.00	9.21	+12.80

RDIV vs. EPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the EPMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and EPMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. EPMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than EPMV's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and EPMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.97%	-8.78%	-41.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.84%	-8.78%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.36%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-1.70%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.59%	-1.00%

Volatility

RDIV vs. EPMV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) at 3.52%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDIV	EPMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.52%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	11.57%	-2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	15.48%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	15.35%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	15.35%	+6.50%

RDIV vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDIV vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than EPMV's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.45%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDIV and EPMV in my portfolio?

RDIV and EPMV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDIV or EPMV?

RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to EPMV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs EPMV's -8.78%.

Which ETF is better, RDIV or EPMV?

On 1-year performance, RDIV leads with 36.48% vs 25.47% for EPMV. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EPMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDIV or EPMV?

Over the 1-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 36.48% return vs 25.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDIV or EPMV?

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDIV or EPMV?

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.

What is the main difference between RDIV and EPMV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.88% for EPMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.