PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDFI vs. RSEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RDFI vs. RSEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RDFI vs. RSEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
-1.63%9.83%13.15%8.57%-14.92%
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
-4.66%20.54%18.54%10.21%-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly higher than RSEE's -4.66% return.


RDFI

1D
2.16%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

RSEE

1D
2.50%
1M
-9.62%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RDFI vs. RSEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RSEE's 1.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RDFI vs. RSEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDFI
RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

RSEE
RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFI vs. RSEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDFIRSEEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.80

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.26

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

5.44

-2.44

RDFI vs. RSEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the RSEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and RSEE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDFIRSEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.80

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.52

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between RDFI and RSEE is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RDFI vs. RSEE - Dividend Comparison

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than RSEE's 0.25% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
8.39%8.17%8.14%7.38%4.70%6.78%1.01%
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
0.25%0.24%9.02%0.84%1.97%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RDFI vs. RSEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, which is greater than RSEE's maximum drawdown of -21.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and RSEE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RDFIRSEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-21.60%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-14.97%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-10.71%

+4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-3.86%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.47%

-1.51%

Volatility

RDFI vs. RSEE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 4.47%, while Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RDFIRSEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

8.01%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

13.69%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

23.46%

-15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

18.95%

-10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

18.95%

-10.99%