RDFI vs. DYNB
RDFI (Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RDFI charges 3.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DYNB.
Performance
RDFI vs. DYNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than DYNB's -0.23% return.
RDFI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
DYNB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $61.40K | $270.14K | $209.31K | |
| $296.48K | $345.49K | $313.16K |
RDFI vs. DYNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 2.38% | -0.04% |
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | -0.23% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDFI and DYNB is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDFI vs. DYNB — Risk / Return Rank
RDFI
DYNB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDFI vs. DYNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDFI | DYNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDFI vs. DYNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, which is greater than DYNB's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and DYNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDFI | DYNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -2.61% | -21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.56% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -0.70% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
RDFI vs. DYNB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDFI | DYNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.37% | 2.97% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 2.97% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.93% | 2.97% | +4.96% |
RDFI vs. DYNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDFI vs. DYNB - Dividend Comparison
RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than DYNB's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 3.39% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.30% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDFI and DYNB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DYNB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DYNB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.
RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.30%, compared with 3.39% for DYNB.
They also come from different issuers: Rareview and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 3.69% for RDFI and 0.60% for DYNB.
Find the right allocation for RDFI and DYNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer