DYNB vs. JOJO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for JOJO.

Performance

DYNB vs. JOJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than JOJO's 2.22% return.

DYNB

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JOJO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 8.86%
• 3Y*: 6.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNB vs. JOJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF	0.43%	0.42%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	2.22%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNB and JOJO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

DYNB vs. JOJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JOJO

JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 39
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNB vs. JOJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNB	JOJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.93	—

Drawdowns

DYNB vs. JOJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum JOJO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and JOJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNB	JOJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-28.43%	+25.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-5.95%	+5.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-15.70%	+15.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DYNB	JOJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94%	6.79%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.94%	11.27%	-8.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.94%	11.27%	-8.33%

DYNB vs. JOJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than JOJO's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYNB vs. JOJO - Dividend Comparison

DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than JOJO's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF	2.64%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	5.13%	4.78%	4.88%	4.30%	3.63%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNB and JOJO in my portfolio?

DYNB and JOJO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DYNB or JOJO?

On fees, DYNB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNB or JOJO?

DYNB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNB or JOJO?

JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.

What is the main difference between DYNB and JOJO?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and ATAC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 1.28% for JOJO.