PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDFI vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDFI vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 38.58% return.


RDFI

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.39%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
38.58%
6M
38.42%
1Y
47.00%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDFI vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
1.84%9.83%13.15%8.57%-17.06%12.51%8.65%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
38.58%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RDFI and COMT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.07

The correlation between RDFI and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDFI vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDFI
COMT

Financial Services

57.4%
100.0%

Energy

32.0%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Industrials

2.0%

-

Technology

1.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Financial Services

RDFI
57.4%
COMT
100.0%

Energy

RDFI
32.0%
COMT

-

Utilities

RDFI
3.7%
COMT

-

Real Estate

RDFI
2.2%
COMT

-

Industrials

RDFI
2.0%
COMT

-

Technology

RDFI
1.7%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDFI
0.4%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

RDFI
0.3%
COMT

-

Communication Services

RDFI
0.1%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

RDFI
0.1%
COMT

-

Healthcare

RDFI
0.0%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDFI vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDFI
RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFI vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDFICOMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

2.22

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

2.86

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

6.26

-5.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.49

14.93

-10.44

RDFI vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDFICOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.22

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.65

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.20

+0.57

Drawdowns

RDFI vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDFICOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-51.89%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-8.02%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.41%

-13.31%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

-29.00%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-5.56%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-24.08%

+16.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.36%

-1.27%

Volatility

RDFI vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 2.42%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDFICOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

7.60%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

18.80%

-12.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

21.38%

-14.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

21.07%

-12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

18.89%

-10.93%

RDFI vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDFI vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than COMT's 5.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.59%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
8.98%8.17%8.14%7.38%4.70%6.78%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDFI and COMT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to RDFI (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDFI dropped -23.71% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.58% vs 2.86% for RDFI. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RDFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.

RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 5.59% for COMT.

RDFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.69% for RDFI and 0.48% for COMT.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDFI and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer