RDDT vs. UCO
RDDT (Reddit, Inc.) is a stock, while UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Over the past year, RDDT returned 55.58% vs 115.57% for UCO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RDDT vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDDT achieves a -19.99% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return.
RDDT
- 1D
- 8.51%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- -19.99%
- 6M
- -17.44%
- 1Y
- 55.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCO
- 1D
- -3.93%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 139.34%
- 6M
- 124.58%
- 1Y
- 115.57%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- -11.98%
RDDT vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RDDT Reddit, Inc. | -19.99% | 40.64% | 224.03% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 139.34% | -29.75% | -14.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDDT and UCO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.04 |
The correlation between RDDT and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDDT vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
RDDT
UCO
RDDT vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDDT | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.34 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 6.32 | -4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDDT | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.03 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | -0.34 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
RDDT vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDDT drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDDT and UCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDDT | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -99.95% | +38.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.99% | -34.77% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.06% | -99.26% | +67.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -85.49% | +61.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.45% | 18.34% | +11.11% |
Volatility
RDDT vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) is 19.80%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.99%. This indicates that RDDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDDT | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | 20.99% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | 46.57% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.96% | 57.26% | +8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.31% | 59.81% | +21.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.31% | 71.35% | +9.96% |
Dividends
RDDT vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDDT nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDDT and UCO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCO has higher volatility (20.99%) compared to RDDT (19.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDDT dropped -61.41% vs UCO's -99.95%.
UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDDT and UCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer