RCS vs. PIM
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and PIM (Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 3.31%/yr vs 4.36%/yr for PIM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCS vs. PIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than PIM's -1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has underperformed PIM with an annualized return of 3.31%, while PIM has yielded a comparatively higher 4.36% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -16.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
PIM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
RCS vs. PIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.34% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | -1.75% | 10.91% | 10.88% | 8.45% | -12.49% | -0.44% | -2.97% | 20.68% | -5.10% | 10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and PIM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. PIM — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
PIM
RCS vs. PIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.46 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 1.04 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. PIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than PIM's maximum drawdown of -43.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and PIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -43.27% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -6.45% | -26.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -7.91% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -17.66% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -28.15% | -18.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.91% | -3.76% | -25.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -9.52% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 2.86% | +16.63% |
Volatility
RCS vs. PIM - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) at 2.30%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 2.30% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.85% | 8.63% | +12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 11.36% | +12.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 10.73% | +14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 13.12% | +12.71% |
Dividends
RCS vs. PIM - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than PIM's 8.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | 8.38% | 7.90% | 8.10% | 8.28% | 8.25% | 6.68% | 8.32% | 7.59% | 6.82% | 6.54% | 6.77% | 6.86% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.02% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and PIM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to PIM (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs PIM's -43.27%.
PIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and PIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer