RCS vs. PIM
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and PIM (Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 3.60%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for PIM. At 0.15, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCS vs. PIM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than PIM's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has underperformed PIM with an annualized return of 3.60%, while PIM has yielded a comparatively higher 4.81% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -27.93%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
PIM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
RCS vs. PIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -3.80% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | 0.06% | 10.91% | 10.88% | 8.45% | -12.49% | -0.44% | -2.97% | 20.68% | -5.10% | 10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and PIM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. PIM — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
PIM
RCS vs. PIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 0.91 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 1.53 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.62 | -1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 4.29 | -4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.91 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.26 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.37 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.17 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
RCS vs. PIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than PIM's maximum drawdown of -43.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and PIM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -43.27% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -6.45% | -26.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -18.39% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -28.15% | -18.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.38% | -1.99% | -29.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -9.55% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 2.44% | +12.61% |
Volatility
RCS vs. PIM - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) at 4.77%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | PIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 4.77% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 8.80% | +11.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 11.07% | +13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 10.63% | +14.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 13.07% | +12.70% |
Dividends
RCS vs. PIM - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than PIM's 8.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 8.38% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | 8.06% | 7.90% | 8.10% | 8.28% | 8.25% | 6.68% | 8.32% | 7.59% | 6.82% | 6.54% | 6.77% | 6.86% |