RCS vs. BILDX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, RCS returned 1.37%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for BILDX. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCS vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly lower than BILDX's 0.42% return.
RCS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -21.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
BILDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $661.35K | $644.81K | $738.42K |
RCS vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -2.43% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.42% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and BILDX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
BILDX
RCS vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.20 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 1.58 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 4.74 | -5.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and BILDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -15.68% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -2.21% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -3.14% | -29.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -15.60% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.40% | -1.11% | -29.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -2.96% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.67% | 0.73% | +20.94% |
Volatility
RCS vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) at 0.84%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 0.84% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.55% | 2.39% | +14.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.22% | 3.08% | +21.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 4.43% | +20.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 4.08% | +21.74% |
Dividends
RCS vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than BILDX's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.56% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.28% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and BILDX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to BILDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs BILDX's -15.68%.
BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and BILDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer