RCS vs. BILDX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, RCS returned 2.04%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BILDX. At 0.12, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCS vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than BILDX's 0.04% return.
RCS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -27.93%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
BILDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
RCS vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -3.80% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 13.49% |
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.04% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and BILDX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
BILDX
RCS vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 1.97 | -2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 2.99 | -2.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.69 | -2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 9.80 | -9.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.97 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.40 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.73 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
RCS vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and BILDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -15.68% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -2.21% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -15.68% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.38% | -1.48% | -29.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -3.03% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 0.61% | +14.44% |
Volatility
RCS vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) at 1.40%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 1.40% | +9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 2.09% | +18.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 3.28% | +21.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 4.39% | +20.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 4.11% | +21.66% |
Dividends
RCS vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than BILDX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 8.38% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.43% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |