RCS vs. ARINX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and ARINX (Archer Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 3.60%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for ARINX. At 0.16, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCS vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than ARINX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has outperformed ARINX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while ARINX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.32% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -27.93%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
ARINX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
RCS vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -3.80% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
ARINX Archer Income Fund | 0.12% | 4.42% | 4.90% | 3.99% | -6.84% | 1.52% | 4.29% | 6.19% | 0.35% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and ARINX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2011 | 0.16 |
The correlation between RCS and ARINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
ARINX
RCS vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCS | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 2.89 | -2.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 4.44 | -4.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.62 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.69 | -2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 11.32 | -11.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCS | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 2.89 | -2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.00 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.00 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.00 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
RCS vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum ARINX drawdown of -97.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and ARINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -97.42% | +50.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -1.63% | -31.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -97.42% | +61.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -97.42% | +50.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.38% | -97.29% | +65.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -9.51% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 0.39% | +14.66% |
Volatility
RCS vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.87%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 0.87% | +9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 1.20% | +19.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 1.76% | +22.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 1,971.76% | -1,946.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 1,394.03% | -1,368.26% |
Dividends
RCS vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than ARINX's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 8.38% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
ARINX Archer Income Fund | 3.18% | 2.72% | 3.77% | 3.15% | 2.72% | 2.56% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.84% | 2.94% | 2.84% | 2.79% |