PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIM vs. BILDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIM vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIM achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than BILDX's 1.07% return.


PIM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.35%

BILDX

1D
0.32%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIM vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIM
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust
-1.81%10.91%10.88%8.45%-12.49%-0.44%-2.97%20.68%-5.10%10.52%
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
1.07%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PIM and BILDX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.20

The correlation between PIM and BILDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIM vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIM
PIM Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIM vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIMBILDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.42

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

7.65

-6.58

PIM vs. BILDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the BILDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIM and BILDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIM vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIM drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIM and BILDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIMBILDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-15.68%

-27.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-2.21%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-3.31%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.66%

-15.68%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-0.46%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-2.98%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

0.70%

+2.15%

Volatility

PIM vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) at 0.95%. This indicates that PIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIMBILDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

0.95%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

2.26%

+6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

3.06%

+8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

4.42%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

4.09%

+9.03%

PIM vs. BILDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIM has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BILDX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIM vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison

PIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than BILDX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.93%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%0.00%0.00%
PIM
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust
7.63%7.90%8.10%8.28%8.25%6.68%8.32%7.59%6.82%6.54%6.77%6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIM and BILDX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIM has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to BILDX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIM dropped -43.27% vs BILDX's -15.68%.

BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIM and BILDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer