PIM vs. LMSMX
PIM (Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) and LMSMX (Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PIM returned 2.78%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for LMSMX. At 0.17, their price movements are largely independent. PIM charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LMSMX.
Performance
PIM vs. LMSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than LMSMX's 1.32% return.
PIM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
LMSMX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
PIM vs. LMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | 0.06% | 10.91% | 10.88% | 8.45% | -12.49% | -0.44% | -2.97% | 20.68% | -5.10% | 8.25% |
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 1.32% | 12.15% | -1.72% | 5.13% | -23.44% | -2.32% | 12.86% | 7.71% | 1.46% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIM and LMSMX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIM vs. LMSMX — Risk / Return Rank
PIM
LMSMX
PIM vs. LMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIM | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.64 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.48 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.64 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 7.51 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIM | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.64 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.17 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.18 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PIM vs. LMSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIM drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than LMSMX's maximum drawdown of -30.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIM and LMSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIM | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -30.76% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -3.05% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.39% | -30.18% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -12.36% | +10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -10.08% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.07% | +1.37% |
Volatility
PIM vs. LMSMX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) at 1.58%. This indicates that PIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PIM | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 1.58% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 2.46% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 6.46% | +4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.63% | 10.38% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 8.21% | +4.86% |
PIM vs. LMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIM has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LMSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIM vs. LMSMX - Dividend Comparison
PIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than LMSMX's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust | 8.06% | 7.90% | 8.10% | 8.28% | 8.25% | 6.68% | 8.32% | 7.59% | 6.82% | 6.54% | 6.77% | 6.86% |
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 4.34% | 4.20% | 5.24% | 4.68% | 3.40% | 3.78% | 6.84% | 7.19% | 3.18% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |