RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
RCRS.DE (Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - RCRS.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Foxberry Tematica Research Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RCRS.DE returned 8.90%/yr vs 19.85%/yr for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCRS.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCRS.DE achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.
RCRS.DE
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 25.61%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 19.71%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCRS.DE Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF | 23.15% | -9.03% | 15.32% | 41.92% | -29.24% | 13.78% | 26.70% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 2.80% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.32% | 7.12% | 4.03% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCRS.DE and 4GLD.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020 | 0.04 |
The correlation between RCRS.DE and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RCRS.DE
4GLD.DE
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCRS.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.82 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 4.63 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCRS.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.31 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 1.23 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, roughly equal to the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRS.DE and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCRS.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -36.79% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.20% | -16.54% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -16.54% | -21.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -16.54% | -21.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -14.95% | +11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.76% | -11.83% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 6.52% | +7.51% |
Volatility
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that RCRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCRS.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 5.09% | +6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 20.09% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.64% | 23.06% | +4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 16.00% | +9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 14.37% | +11.77% |
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCRS.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCRS.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RCRS.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RCRS.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for RCRS.DE.
RCRS.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. RCRS.DE tracks Foxberry Tematica Research Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Davy and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for RCRS.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for RCRS.DE and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer