4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L).
4GLD.DE and XGLS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. XGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Apr 1, 2011. Both 4GLD.DE and XGLS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold ETF | 7.00% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.32% | 7.12% | 4.03% | 13.05% | 21.25% | 3.20% | -1.67% |
XGLS.L Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 6.42% | 54.56% | 30.88% | 14.00% | -6.70% | 1.27% | 15.48% | 23.05% | -4.80% | 5.33% |
Different Trading Currencies
4GLD.DE is traded in EUR, while XGLS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGLS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly higher than XGLS.L's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE has outperformed XGLS.L with an annualized return of 14.14%, while XGLS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 22.46%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 30.07%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
XGLS.L
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- 31.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLS.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
XGLS.L
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4GLD.DE | XGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.50 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.95 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.16 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.83 | 7.77 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4GLD.DE | XGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | 1.07 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | 0.68 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and XGLS.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor XGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum XGLS.L drawdown of -45.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and XGLS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | XGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -46.55% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -18.19% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -21.87% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | -22.99% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.47% | -13.35% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -23.50% | +11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 4.64% | -0.30% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. XGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) have volatilities of 10.85% and 11.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | XGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.85% | 11.23% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.86% | 22.32% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 26.29% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 18.08% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 16.82% | -2.58% |