4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L).
4GLD.DE and EGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. EGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both 4GLD.DE and EGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 4GLD.DE or EGLN.L.
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and EGLN.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
4GLD.DE:
3.02
EGLN.L:
3.46
4GLD.DE:
3.98
EGLN.L:
4.43
4GLD.DE:
1.54
EGLN.L:
1.61
4GLD.DE:
7.96
EGLN.L:
9.50
4GLD.DE:
18.72
EGLN.L:
21.87
4GLD.DE:
2.32%
EGLN.L:
2.29%
4GLD.DE:
14.33%
EGLN.L:
14.46%
4GLD.DE:
-36.79%
EGLN.L:
-18.35%
4GLD.DE:
0.00%
EGLN.L:
-0.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 12.03% return.
4GLD.DE
7.73%
5.26%
21.58%
43.40%
13.78%
9.31%
EGLN.L
12.03%
6.82%
26.03%
50.01%
13.05%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
4GLD.DE
EGLN.L
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and EGLN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) is 1.94%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.