PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS).

RCRS.DE and TSWE.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCRS.DE is a passively managed fund by Davy that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Tematica Research Cybersecurity & Data Privacy. It was launched on Feb 12, 2020. TSWE.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2013. Both RCRS.DE and TSWE.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RCRS.DE
Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF		-10.20%-9.03%15.32%41.92%-29.24%13.78%26.70%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF		0.64%13.10%17.22%16.38%-13.18%29.50%-0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCRS.DE achieves a -10.20% return, which is significantly lower than TSWE.AS's 0.64% return.

RCRS.DE

1D
1.53%
1M
3.26%
YTD
-10.20%
6M
-18.80%
1Y
-16.99%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
—

TSWE.AS

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
0.64%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF

VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF

Often compared with RCRS.DE:
RCRS.DE vs. CBRS.DERCRS.DE vs. W1TB.DERCRS.DE vs. USPY.DE
Often compared with TSWE.AS:
TSWE.AS vs. VWRL.ASTSWE.AS vs. VTITSWE.AS vs. VFEM.DETSWE.AS vs. MXWS.LTSWE.AS vs. GGRG.LTSWE.AS vs. QQQTSWE.AS vs. VVGM.DE

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCRS.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TSWE.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.

RCRS.DE
Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RCRS.DE
RCRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RCRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS
TSWE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RCRS.DETSWE.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

0.79

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.76

1.15

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.17

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

3.80

-4.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.94

15.12

-16.06

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCRS.DE and TSWE.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RCRS.DETSWE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

0.79

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.69

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.73

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.68

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between RCRS.DE and TSWE.AS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Dividend Comparison

RCRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSWE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCRS.DE
Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF		1.94%1.94%2.18%2.23%2.38%1.64%1.88%2.34%2.45%2.09%1.85%1.87%

Drawdowns

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than TSWE.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRS.DE and TSWE.AS.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RCRS.DETSWE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-33.67%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-9.18%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.72%

-19.53%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.67%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.95%

-5.17%

-24.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-4.87%

-8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.44%

2.00%

+10.44%

Volatility

RCRS.DE vs. TSWE.AS - Volatility Comparison

Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) at 5.50%. This indicates that RCRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSWE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RCRS.DETSWE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

5.50%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

9.54%

+9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.71%

16.67%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

13.52%

+11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

14.93%

+10.64%