PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCRS.DE achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.


RCRS.DE

1D
-0.39%
1M
25.61%
YTD
23.15%
6M
19.71%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*

LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
16.45%
YTD
63.83%
6M
64.57%
1Y
130.64%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RCRS.DE
Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF
23.15%-9.03%15.32%41.92%-29.24%13.78%26.70%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%-34.66%37.56%21.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCRS.DE
RCRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RCRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RCRS.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.59

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

10.37

-10.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

32.83

-32.30

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCRS.DELSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

4.27

-4.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

1.15

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.82

-0.42

Drawdowns

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCRS.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-39.77%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-12.53%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.72%

-36.22%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.72%

-39.77%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-3.34%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-9.37%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.03%

3.96%

+10.07%

Volatility

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (RCRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) at 11.23%. This indicates that RCRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCRS.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

11.23%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.28%

22.18%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.64%

30.40%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.48%

31.21%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

26.06%

+0.08%

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

RCRS.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RCRS.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

RCRS.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. RCRS.DE tracks Foxberry Tematica Research Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Davy and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCRS.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer