RCRIX vs. PFLRX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) and Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX).
RCRIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2016. PFLRX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Aug 3, 2004.
Performance
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 0.88% | 5.56% | 10.01% | 9.85% | -0.72% | 2.81% | -8.51% | 4.46% | 59.17% | 3.09% |
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | -1.61% | 4.74% | 6.34% | 11.01% | -2.78% | 3.04% | 0.69% | 8.14% | -0.66% | 1.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCRIX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than PFLRX's -1.61% return.
RCRIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
PFLRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCRIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PFLRX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCRIX vs. PFLRX — Risk / Return Rank
RCRIX
PFLRX
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) and Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCRIX | PFLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.51 | 1.18 | +2.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.49 | 1.88 | +3.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.02 | 1.31 | +1.72 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.44 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.96 | 4.99 | +18.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCRIX | PFLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 1.18 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.27 | 1.39 | +1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.94 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCRIX and PFLRX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Dividend Comparison
RCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than PFLRX's 6.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 4.67% | 5.30% | 6.85% | 7.90% | 3.80% | 2.34% | 3.16% | 3.36% | 49.16% | 3.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.38% | 6.69% | 6.25% | 7.27% | 3.48% | 2.63% | 3.10% | 4.56% | 4.54% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 4.45% |
Drawdowns
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCRIX drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, smaller than the maximum PFLRX drawdown of -32.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRIX and PFLRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCRIX | PFLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.00% | -32.89% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -2.29% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.75% | -6.95% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.98% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -1.75% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.66% | -0.43% |
Volatility
RCRIX vs. PFLRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) is 0.30%, while Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that RCRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCRIX | PFLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 0.77% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.58% | 1.72% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54% | 2.93% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.60% | 2.81% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.01% | 4.01% | +4.00% |