PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLRX vs. DDFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, PFLRX has underperformed DDFLX with an annualized return of 3.72%, while DDFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.38% annualized return.


PFLRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.72%

DDFLX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.20%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
-0.00%4.74%6.34%11.01%-2.78%3.04%0.69%8.14%-0.66%3.28%
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
1.63%6.01%8.92%10.75%-0.62%5.46%3.17%10.69%1.26%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLRX and DDFLX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2010

0.50

The correlation between PFLRX and DDFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLRX vs. DDFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLRX
PFLRX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PFLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DDFLX
DDFLX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DDFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFLRXDDFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

2.11

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

5.38

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

19.57

-15.13

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the DDFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLRX and DDFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.89%, which is greater than DDFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and DDFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLRXDDFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.89%

-18.09%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-1.11%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.01%

-2.05%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.95%

-5.18%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.74%

-18.09%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.25%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-0.67%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.30%

+0.44%

Volatility

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) have volatilities of 0.67% and 0.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLRXDDFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.66%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

1.63%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

2.27%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

2.70%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

3.50%

+0.51%

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFLX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLRX vs. DDFLX - Dividend Comparison

PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than DDFLX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
6.80%7.21%8.62%7.17%5.04%3.96%4.89%6.54%5.73%4.33%2.09%2.34%
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
6.30%6.69%6.25%7.27%3.48%2.63%3.10%4.56%4.54%3.69%3.71%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLRX and DDFLX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFLRX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to DDFLX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLRX dropped -32.89% vs DDFLX's -18.09%.

DDFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLRX and DDFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer