RCRIX vs. BINC
RCRIX (RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both funds - RCRIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by RiverPark Funds, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 3 years, RCRIX returned 7.41%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for BINC. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCRIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
RCRIX vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCRIX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.23% return.
RCRIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCRIX vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 2.14% | 5.56% | 10.01% | 5.48% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.23% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCRIX and BINC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCRIX vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
RCRIX
BINC
RCRIX vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCRIX | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +15.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 8.21 | 1.49 | +6.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 26.83 | 2.11 | +24.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 167.21 | 8.22 | +158.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCRIX vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCRIX drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRIX and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCRIX | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.00% | -2.69% | -27.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.19% | -2.69% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -2.69% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -0.36% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.69% | -0.66% |
Volatility
RCRIX vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) is 0.21%, while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that RCRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCRIX | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.60% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.60% | 1.88% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77% | 2.30% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.60% | 2.99% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 2.99% | +4.92% |
RCRIX vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCRIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCRIX vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
RCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than BINC's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.85% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 4.94% | 5.30% | 6.85% | 7.90% | 3.80% | 2.34% | 3.16% | 3.36% | 49.16% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCRIX and BINC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BINC has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to RCRIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCRIX dropped -30.00% vs BINC's -2.69%.
RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.62 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCRIX and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer