PortfoliosLab logo
PFLRX vs. FLRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PFLRX and FLRT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PFLRX:

2.17

FLRT:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

PFLRX:

3.62

FLRT:

2.93

Omega Ratio

PFLRX:

1.77

FLRT:

1.83

Calmar Ratio

PFLRX:

1.98

FLRT:

2.32

Martin Ratio

PFLRX:

9.50

FLRT:

12.50

Ulcer Index

PFLRX:

0.63%

FLRT:

0.53%

Daily Std Dev

PFLRX:

2.84%

FLRT:

2.89%

Max Drawdown

PFLRX:

-32.47%

FLRT:

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

PFLRX:

0.00%

FLRT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLRX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLRX has underperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 3.78%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.32% annualized return.


PFLRX

YTD

1.08%

1M

1.70%

6M

2.06%

1Y

6.10%

3Y*

7.88%

5Y*

5.75%

10Y*

3.78%

FLRT

YTD

1.85%

1M

1.82%

6M

2.47%

1Y

6.63%

3Y*

9.23%

5Y*

6.40%

10Y*

4.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund

Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFLRX vs. FLRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFLRX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFLRX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFLRX is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFLRX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFLRX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFLRX is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLRT is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PFLRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLRX and FLRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, less than FLRT's 7.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
6.95%7.57%8.84%4.64%2.64%3.10%4.56%4.54%3.71%3.71%4.45%3.80%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
7.42%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.97%3.20%3.38%3.21%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and FLRT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PFLRX vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.62%. This indicates that PFLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...