PFLRX vs. CAPIX
PFLRX (Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund) and CAPIX (Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund Class I) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past year, PFLRX returned 3.42% vs 7.34% for CAPIX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFLRX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for CAPIX.
Performance
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLRX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than CAPIX's 2.09% return.
PFLRX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
CAPIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | 0.26% | 4.74% | 6.34% | 3.38% |
CAPIX Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund Class I | 2.09% | 7.43% | 8.60% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLRX and CAPIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLRX vs. CAPIX — Risk / Return Rank
PFLRX
CAPIX
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund Class I (CAPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLRX | CAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 4.53 | -3.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 6.84 | -4.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 3.07 | -1.69 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 8.13 | -6.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 41.09 | -35.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLRX | CAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 4.53 | -3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 3.00 | -2.04 |
Drawdowns
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.89%, which is greater than CAPIX's maximum drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and CAPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLRX | CAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.89% | -1.96% | -30.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -0.94% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.75% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -0.26% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.19% | +0.54% |
Volatility
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) is 0.66%, while Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund Class I (CAPIX) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that PFLRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLRX | CAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 0.77% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 1.56% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 1.69% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.83% | 2.57% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 2.57% | +1.45% |
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFLRX vs. CAPIX - Dividend Comparison
PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, less than CAPIX's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPIX Calamos Aksia Alternative Credit and Income Fund Class I | 8.66% | 7.18% | 4.42% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.28% | 6.69% | 6.25% | 7.27% | 3.48% | 2.63% | 3.10% | 4.56% | 4.54% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 4.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFLRX and CAPIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAPIX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to PFLRX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLRX dropped -32.89% vs CAPIX's -1.96%.
CAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFLRX and CAPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer