RCLY vs. TMED

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RCLY (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF) and TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCLY is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Reckoner, while TMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCLY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TMED.

Performance

RCLY vs. TMED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RCLY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TMED

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 16.95%
• YTD: 16.91%
• 1Y: 42.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	$608.53	$622.30	$3.07K
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF	$576.43K	$346.09K	$158.73K

RCLY vs. TMED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	1.40%
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF	18.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLY and TMED is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.01

Return for Risk

RCLY vs. TMED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCLY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMED

TMED Risk / Return Rank: 91
TMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TMED Omega Ratio Rank: 90
TMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TMED Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCLY vs. TMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCLY	TMED	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.07	—

Drawdowns

RCLY vs. TMED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLY drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum TMED drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLY and TMED.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLY	TMED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-11.11%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.80%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-2.41%	+1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLY	TMED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46%	18.35%	-14.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.46%	18.11%	-14.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.46%	18.11%	-14.65%

RCLY vs. TMED - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TMED's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLY vs. TMED - Dividend Comparison

RCLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

Position	TTM	2025
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF	0.47%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLY and TMED in my portfolio?

RCLY and TMED have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLY or TMED?

On fees, TMED is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLY or TMED?

TMED is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RCLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLY or TMED?

TMED has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for RCLY.

What is the main difference between RCLY and TMED?

RCLY is categorized as Actively Managed, while TMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RCLY and 0.44% for TMED.