RCLY vs. SCUB

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

RCLY (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCLY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.

Performance

RCLY vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RCLY

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCUB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCLY vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	3.08%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLY and SCUB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.18

Return for Risk

RCLY vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

RCLY vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLY drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLY and SCUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLY	SCUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-0.08%	-3.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	0.00%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-0.01%	-0.76%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLY	SCUB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	0.79%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.69%	0.79%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.69%	0.79%	+2.90%

RCLY vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLY vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

RCLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.

Position	TTM
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	0.00%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLY and SCUB in my portfolio?

RCLY and SCUB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLY or SCUB?

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLY or SCUB?

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RCLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLY or SCUB?

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for RCLY.

What is the main difference between RCLY and SCUB?

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RCLY and 0.30% for SCUB.