PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCLY vs. RCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCLY vs. RCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RCLY

1D
0.04%
1M
0.37%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RCLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
6M
1.63%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.54K$33.07K$123.70K
$608.63$622.41$3.08K

RCLY vs. RCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RCLY and RCLO is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCLY vs. RCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RCLY vs. RCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCLY vs. RCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLY drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, roughly equal to the maximum RCLO drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLY and RCLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCLYRCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.70%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-0.41%

-0.26%

Volatility

RCLY vs. RCLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCLYRCLODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

2.86%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.86%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.86%

+0.59%

RCLY vs. RCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RCLO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCLY vs. RCLO - Dividend Comparison

RCLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.


PositionTTM2025
RCLO
Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF
4.72%1.32%
RCLY
Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCLY and RCLO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RCLO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RCLO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RCLY.

RCLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for RCLY.

Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RCLY and 0.50% for RCLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCLY and RCLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer