RCLO vs. FLXR

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RCLO (Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF) and FLXR (TCW Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCLO is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Reckoner, while FLXR is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCLO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FLXR.

Performance

RCLO vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCLO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLXR's 1.33% return.

RCLO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FLXR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.97%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	$13.36M	$16.28M	$17.08M
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	$21.96K	$31.03K	$123.31K

RCLO vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	2.56%	1.39%
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	1.33%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLO and FLXR is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

RCLO vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLXR

FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCLO vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCLO	FLXR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.42	—

Drawdowns

RCLO vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLO and FLXR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLO	FLXR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-1.94%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.43%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.35%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLO	FLXR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	2.35%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.87%	2.79%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.87%	2.79%	+0.08%

RCLO vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLO vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison

RCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than FLXR's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	5.91%	5.66%	3.44%
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	4.72%	1.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLO and FLXR in my portfolio?

RCLO and FLXR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLO or FLXR?

On fees, FLXR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLO or FLXR?

FLXR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RCLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLO or FLXR?

FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.72% for RCLO.

What is the main difference between RCLO and FLXR?

RCLO is categorized as Actively Managed, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RCLO and 0.40% for FLXR.