RCL vs. KULR
RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. RCL operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, RCL returned 24.69%/yr vs -29.09%/yr for KULR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCL vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.
RCL
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 45.28%
- 5Y*
- 24.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
KULR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -60.49%
- 3Y*
- -11.82%
- 5Y*
- -29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
RCL vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | -1.45% | 22.46% | 78.98% | 161.97% | -35.72% | 2.96% | -43.50% | 39.94% | -12.28% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 26.01% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 73.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCL and KULR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
RCL:
$73.71B
KULR:
$148.18M
RCL:
$16.41
KULR:
-$1.57
RCL:
4.04
KULR:
9.11
RCL:
7.51
KULR:
1.22
RCL:
$18.39B
KULR:
$16.17M
RCL:
$8.68B
KULR:
$770.97K
RCL:
$7.13B
KULR:
-$60.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCL vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
RCL
KULR
RCL vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCL | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.94 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | -0.76 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | -0.99 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCL | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | -0.57 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | -0.23 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.11 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
RCL vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCL | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -97.23% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.36% | -79.80% | +47.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.02% | -94.74% | +59.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.64% | -96.86% | +29.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.38% | -90.29% | +65.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.77% | -66.23% | +38.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.98% | 60.84% | -41.86% |
Volatility
RCL vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) is 12.07%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that RCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCL | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.07% | 47.09% | -35.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.21% | 76.46% | -39.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.63% | 106.05% | -60.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.38% | 126.05% | -77.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.29% | 126.51% | -73.22% |
Dividends
RCL vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.84% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 2.22% | 2.66% | 1.81% | 2.08% | 1.33% |
Financials
RCL vs. KULR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and KULR Technology Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RCL and KULR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to RCL (12.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCL dropped -89.49% vs KULR's -97.23%.
RCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCL and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer