PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCGE vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCGE vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCGE achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.


RCGE

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.70%
6M
7.02%
YTD
9.52%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.42%

POW

1D
0.90%
1M
-10.55%
6M
14.53%
YTD
31.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.21M$2.19M$3.04M
$848.09$796.67$990.58

RCGE vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RCGE and POW is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCGE vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCGE
RCGE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RCGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCGE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RCGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCGE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCGE vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RCGEPOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

RCGE vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCGE vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCGE drawdown since its inception was -13.32%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCGE and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCGEPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-28.02%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-22.73%

+22.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-5.52%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

Volatility

RCGE vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCGEPOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

34.38%

-22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

34.38%

-19.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

34.38%

-19.21%

RCGE vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCGE vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RCGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than POW's 0.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RCGE and POW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RCGE.

RCGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.15% for POW.

RCGE is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RCGE and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCGE and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer