RCGE vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RCGE (RockCreek Global Equality ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RCGE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by RockCreek, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RCGE is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, RCGE returned 15.08% vs 29.75% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. RCGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

RCGE vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCGE achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 51.89% return.

RCGE

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 15.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -17.64%
• YTD: 51.89%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 29.75%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 9.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCGE vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF	3.89%	13.33%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	51.89%	-9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RCGE and DBO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	-0.21

The correlation between RCGE and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RCGE vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCGE

RCGE Risk / Return Rank: 35
RCGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RCGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RCGE Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RCGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RCGE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 26
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCGE vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCGE	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.86	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	1.36	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.35	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	3.56	+2.02

RCGE vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCGE and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RCGE vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCGE drawdown since its inception was -13.32%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCGE and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCGE	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.32%	-90.18%	+76.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-22.14%	+12.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-60.03%	+58.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-62.22%	+60.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	9.52%	-6.81%

Volatility

RCGE vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) is 3.33%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that RCGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCGE	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	10.39%	-7.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	29.37%	-19.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.37%	34.94%	-22.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	32.53%	-17.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	31.84%	-16.42%

RCGE vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCGE vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

RCGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DBO's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	2.31%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF	1.75%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCGE and DBO in my portfolio?

RCGE and DBO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCGE or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to RCGE (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCGE dropped -13.32% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, RCGE or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 29.75% vs 15.08% for RCGE. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RCGE has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RCGE or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 29.75% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCGE or DBO?

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RCGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCGE or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.75% for RCGE.

What is the main difference between RCGE and DBO?

RCGE is categorized as Global Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: RockCreek and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RCGE and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.