RCGE vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RCGE (RockCreek Global Equality ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCGE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by RockCreek, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RCGE returned 11.30% vs 859.32% for AMDL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

RCGE vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCGE achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 260.90% return.

RCGE

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 11.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: -21.59%
• 1M: 23.64%
• YTD: 260.90%
• 6M: 243.03%
• 1Y: 859.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCGE vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF	2.35%	17.28%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	260.90%	213.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RCGE and AMDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

RCGE vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCGE

RCGE Risk / Return Rank: 29
RCGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
RCGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RCGE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RCGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RCGE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCGE vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCGE	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	6.66	-5.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	4.23	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.56	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	15.61	-14.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	30.60	-26.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCGE vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 6.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCGE and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCGE	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	6.66	-5.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.37	+0.65

Drawdowns

RCGE vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCGE drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCGE and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCGE	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.38%	-88.63%	+76.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-56.13%	+46.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-27.12%	+24.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-48.47%	+46.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	28.58%	-25.87%

Volatility

RCGE vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) is 4.15%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 45.25%. This indicates that RCGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCGE	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	45.25%	-41.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	97.71%	-88.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	131.65%	-119.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	117.43%	-102.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	117.43%	-102.19%

RCGE vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCGE vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

RCGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF	1.77%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCGE and AMDL in my portfolio?

RCGE and AMDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCGE or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (45.25%) compared to RCGE (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCGE dropped -12.38% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, RCGE or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 859.32% vs 11.30% for RCGE. On fees, RCGE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RCGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RCGE or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 859.32% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCGE or AMDL?

RCGE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCGE or AMDL?

RCGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between RCGE and AMDL?

RCGE is categorized as Global Equities, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: RockCreek and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RCGE and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.