PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBSFY vs. EQNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBSFY achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 60.03% return.


RBSFY

1D
2.69%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
14.44%
6M
13.53%
1Y
36.90%
3Y*
23.96%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*

EQNR

1D
-1.89%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
60.03%
6M
64.49%
1Y
60.91%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RBSFY
Rubis SCA ADR
14.44%61.02%11.95%-1.12%-3.33%-30.94%-21.03%2.06%-33.45%
EQNR
Equinor ASA
60.03%7.70%-15.98%-0.78%40.77%64.55%-13.57%-0.99%-21.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RBSFY and EQNR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBSFY:

$4.45B

EQNR:

$92.46B

EPS

RBSFY:

$1.25

EQNR:

$2.15

PE Ratio

RBSFY:

6.83

EQNR:

17.20

PEG Ratio

RBSFY:

4.02

EQNR:

0.54

PS Ratio

RBSFY:

0.34

EQNR:

0.91

PB Ratio

RBSFY:

1.59

EQNR:

2.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBSFY:

$13.15B

EQNR:

$104.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBSFY:

$2.66B

EQNR:

$36.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

RBSFY:

$1.36B

EQNR:

$39.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rubis SCA ADR

Equinor ASA

Return for Risk

RBSFY vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBSFY
RBSFY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RBSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBSFYEQNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.46

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

5.95

+1.37

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBSFY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the EQNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBSFY and EQNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBSFYEQNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.71

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.55

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.29

-0.39

Drawdowns

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBSFY drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBSFY and EQNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBSFYEQNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.33%

-66.77%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-17.72%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-27.58%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.32%

-35.50%

-23.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.97%

-11.99%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.71%

-21.49%

-32.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

10.27%

-5.22%

Volatility

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) is 9.15%, while Equinor ASA (EQNR) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that RBSFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBSFYEQNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

10.75%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.37%

29.65%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.96%

35.87%

+21.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.46%

33.84%

+19.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.11%

36.27%

+18.84%

Dividends

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison

RBSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than EQNR's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EQNR
Equinor ASA
4.06%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%
RBSFY
Rubis SCA ADR
5.34%6.11%11.82%8.48%7.21%7.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rubis SCA ADR and Equinor ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202120222023202420252026
3.24B
27.82B
(RBSFY) Total Revenue
(EQNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rubis SCA ADR and Equinor ASA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
9.4%
44.3%
Portfolio components
RBSFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a gross profit of 304.47M and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.

EQNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

RBSFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported an operating income of 226.80M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

EQNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

RBSFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a net income of 144.31M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

EQNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBSFY and EQNR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQNR has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to RBSFY (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBSFY dropped -73.33% vs EQNR's -66.77%.

EQNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBSFY and EQNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer