RBSFY vs. EQNR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR).

Performance

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RBSFY Rubis SCA ADR	11.23%	61.02%	11.95%	-1.12%	-3.33%	-30.94%	-21.03%	2.06%	-33.45%
EQNR Equinor ASA	73.21%	7.70%	-15.98%	-0.78%	40.77%	64.55%	-13.57%	-0.99%	-21.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBSFY : $4.33B EQNR : $101.70B
EPS RBSFY : $1.25 EQNR : $1.94
PE Ratio RBSFY : 6.63 EQNR : 20.77
PEG Ratio RBSFY : 3.91 EQNR : 0.65
PS Ratio RBSFY : 0.33 EQNR : 0.99
PB Ratio RBSFY : 1.54 EQNR : 2.52
Total Revenue (TTM) RBSFY : $13.15B EQNR : $105.80B
Gross Profit (TTM) RBSFY : $2.66B EQNR : $28.50B
EBITDA (TTM) RBSFY : $1.36B EQNR : $36.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBSFY achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 73.21% return.

RBSFY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.53%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 51.52%
• 3Y*: 25.94%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: —

EQNR

• 1D: -4.29%
• 1M: 25.94%
• YTD: 73.21%
• 6M: 69.08%
• 1Y: 59.26%
• 3Y*: 23.93%
• 5Y*: 24.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RBSFY vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBSFY

RBSFY Risk / Return Rank: 76
RBSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RBSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RBSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RBSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RBSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EQNR

EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 83
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBSFY	EQNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.75	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.32	-0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	3.42	+0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	5.68	+3.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBSFY Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the EQNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBSFY and EQNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBSFY	EQNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.75	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.74	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.33	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between RBSFY and EQNR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison

RBSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than EQNR's 3.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RBSFY Rubis SCA ADR	5.50%	6.11%	11.82%	8.48%	7.21%	7.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQNR Equinor ASA	3.66%	7.66%	12.66%	11.38%	3.30%	2.13%	4.32%	5.07%	3.26%

Drawdowns

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBSFY drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBSFY and EQNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBSFY	EQNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-66.77%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-17.72%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.32%	-35.50%	-23.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.02%	-4.74%	-24.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.52%	-21.78%	-32.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	10.94%	-5.81%

Volatility

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison

Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to Equinor ASA (EQNR) at 13.08%. This indicates that RBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBSFY	EQNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.86%	13.08%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.36%	24.42%	+16.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.67%	34.02%	+26.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.10%	33.09%	+20.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.58%	35.98%	+19.60%

Financials

RBSFY vs. EQNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rubis SCA ADR and Equinor ASA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RBSFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a gross profit of 304.47M and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.

EQNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of -907.93M and revenue of 25.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.6%.

RBSFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported an operating income of 226.80M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

EQNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 7.42B and revenue of 25.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

RBSFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a net income of 144.31M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

EQNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 1.31B and revenue of 25.26B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.