RBSFY vs. EQNR
RBSFY (Rubis SCA ADR) and EQNR (Equinor ASA) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — RBSFY in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing, EQNR in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 5 years, RBSFY returned 3.25%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for EQNR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBSFY achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 36.73% return.
RBSFY
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EQNR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -16.38%
- YTD
- 36.73%
- 6M
- 39.56%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- —
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBSFY Rubis SCA ADR | 4.32% | 61.02% | 11.95% | -1.12% | -3.33% | -30.94% | -21.03% | 2.06% | -33.45% |
EQNR Equinor ASA | 36.73% | 7.70% | -15.98% | -0.78% | 40.77% | 64.55% | -13.57% | -0.99% | -21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBSFY and EQNR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
RBSFY:
$3.83B
EQNR:
$78.99B
RBSFY:
€1.25
EQNR:
$2.15
RBSFY:
5.17
EQNR:
14.69
RBSFY:
3.05
EQNR:
0.46
RBSFY:
0.26
EQNR:
0.78
RBSFY:
1.20
EQNR:
1.81
RBSFY:
€13.15B
EQNR:
$104.23B
RBSFY:
€2.66B
EQNR:
$36.46B
RBSFY:
€1.36B
EQNR:
$39.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBSFY vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank
RBSFY
EQNR
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBSFY | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 3.59 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBSFY drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBSFY and EQNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBSFY | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -66.77% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -24.80% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -27.58% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.98% | -35.50% | -20.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.43% | -24.80% | -8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.45% | -21.46% | -31.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 9.14% | -3.78% |
Volatility
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison
Rubis SCA ADR (RBSFY) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Equinor ASA (EQNR) at 10.38%. This indicates that RBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBSFY | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 10.38% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.48% | 30.90% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.35% | 35.79% | +21.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.19% | 33.86% | +19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.06% | 36.29% | +18.77% |
Dividends
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison
RBSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than EQNR's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQNR Equinor ASA | 4.75% | 7.66% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 3.30% | 2.13% | 4.32% | 5.07% | 3.26% |
RBSFY Rubis SCA ADR | 6.61% | 6.11% | 11.82% | 8.48% | 7.21% | 7.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rubis SCA ADR and Equinor ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBSFY vs. EQNR - Profitability Comparison
RBSFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a gross profit of 304.47M and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.
EQNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
RBSFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported an operating income of 226.80M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
EQNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
RBSFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubis SCA ADR reported a net income of 144.31M and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
EQNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBSFY and EQNR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBSFY has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to EQNR (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBSFY dropped -73.33% vs EQNR's -66.77%.
EQNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBSFY and EQNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer