RBRK vs. LIF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RBRK (Rubrik, Inc.) and LIF (Life360, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RBRK in Software - Infrastructure, LIF in Software - Application. Over the past year, RBRK returned -24.49% vs -25.93% for LIF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBRK vs. LIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBRK achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.

RBRK

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: -10.84%
• 6M: -16.36%
• 1Y: -24.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 17.44%
• YTD: -29.45%
• 6M: -33.03%
• 1Y: -25.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBRK vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RBRK Rubrik, Inc.	-10.84%	17.01%	108.15%
LIF Life360, Inc.	-29.45%	55.42%	58.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RBRK and LIF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBRK : $13.89B LIF : $3.88B
EPS RBRK : -$1.45 LIF : $1.75
PS Ratio RBRK : 9.49 LIF : 7.30
Total Revenue (TTM) RBRK : $1.42B LIF : $528.98M
Gross Profit (TTM) RBRK : $1.15B LIF : $407.86M
EBITDA (TTM) RBRK : -$275.30M LIF : $26.53M

Return for Risk

RBRK vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBRK

RBRK Risk / Return Rank: 28
RBRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
RBRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RBRK Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RBRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RBRK Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LIF

LIF Risk / Return Rank: 27
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 26
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBRK vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBRK	LIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	-0.43	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	-0.23	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.97	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.43	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	-0.70	-0.07

RBRK vs. LIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBRK Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is comparable to the LIF Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBRK and LIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBRK vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBRK drawdown since its inception was -56.08%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBRK and LIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBRK	LIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.08%	-65.64%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.52%	-65.64%	+10.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.63%	-59.19%	+27.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-21.35%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.39%	40.82%	-10.43%

Volatility

RBRK vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison

Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) has a higher volatility of 20.37% compared to Life360, Inc. (LIF) at 16.67%. This indicates that RBRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBRK	LIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.37%	16.67%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.67%	52.85%	-8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.64%	67.08%	-4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.17%	62.97%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.17%	62.97%	+1.20%

Dividends

RBRK vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBRK nor LIF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RBRK vs. LIF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rubrik, Inc. and Life360, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RBRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported a gross profit of 311.78M and revenue of 387.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.6%.

LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.

RBRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported an operating income of -52.63M and revenue of 387.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.6%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

RBRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported a net income of -41.85M and revenue of 387.07M, resulting in a net margin of -10.8%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBRK and LIF in my portfolio?

RBRK and LIF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBRK or LIF?

RBRK has higher volatility (20.37%) compared to LIF (16.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBRK dropped -56.08% vs LIF's -65.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.