PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Robotics funds from Global X tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.TO returned 1.19%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for BOTZ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOT.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 12.57% return.

RBOT.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.73%
YTD
9.74%
6M
12.67%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
—

BOTZ

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.02%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.45%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		9.74%8.45%13.12%36.79%-43.99%8.06%48.18%28.46%-26.43%-1.50%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		12.57%8.93%21.91%35.90%-38.61%7.67%49.35%25.32%-22.26%-4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and BOTZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.81

The correlation between RBOT.TO and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RBOT.TO
BOTZ

Industrials

49.0%
48.6%

Technology

29.4%
31.8%

Healthcare

9.4%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
6.1%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.5%

Financial Services

1.0%
0.9%

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Industrials

RBOT.TO
49.0%
BOTZ
48.6%

Technology

RBOT.TO
29.4%
BOTZ
31.8%

Healthcare

RBOT.TO
9.4%
BOTZ
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RBOT.TO
7.0%
BOTZ
6.1%

Communication Services

RBOT.TO
5.2%
BOTZ
4.5%

Financial Services

RBOT.TO
1.0%
BOTZ
0.9%

Energy

RBOT.TO
0.5%
BOTZ
0.5%

Basic Materials

RBOT.TO

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

RBOT.TO

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Real Estate

RBOT.TO

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

RBOT.TO

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Often compared with RBOT.TO:
RBOT.TO vs. XAIXRBOT.TO vs. ROBORBOT.TO vs. RBTX.LRBOT.TO vs. AIQRBOT.TO vs. AIGO.TORBOT.TO vs. CNX1.LRBOT.TO vs. FBOT
Often compared with BOTZ:
BOTZ vs. ROBOBOTZ vs. AIQBOTZ vs. ARKQBOTZ vs. IRBOBOTZ vs. ROBTBOTZ vs. SPYBOTZ vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RBOT.TOBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.12
1.35

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.72
2.03

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.75

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

5.54

-0.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RBOT.TOBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.25

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.51

-0.30

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and BOTZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBOT.TOBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-50.68%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.78%

-17.87%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-29.60%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.86%

-50.68%

-6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-1.93%

-5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-14.89%

-6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

5.64%

+0.07%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.84%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBOT.TOBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

7.84%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

17.82%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.33%

23.28%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.53%

24.46%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

23.68%

+1.21%

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.12%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBOT.TO and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBOT.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBOT.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Both ETFs track Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBOT.TO and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOT.TO and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer