PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ.L's -6.43% return.


RBOD.L

1D
-2.77%
1M
-8.78%
6M
13.62%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

BOTZ.L

1D
-3.88%
1M
-10.08%
6M
-11.14%
YTD
-6.43%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
19.47%17.05%5.93%39.67%-34.54%-1.51%
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
-6.43%13.45%13.02%40.20%-42.86%-5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTZ.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.90

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L
RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ.L
BOTZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBOD.LBOTZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.19

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

0.50

+4.97

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and BOTZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ.L drawdown of -53.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and BOTZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBOD.LBOTZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-53.16%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.38%

-17.87%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.00%

-29.07%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.23%

-17.30%

+6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-23.05%

+11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

6.66%

-1.88%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) at 9.62%. This indicates that RBOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBOD.LBOTZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

9.62%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.00%

21.16%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

26.30%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.35%

26.51%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

26.51%

-2.80%

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while BOTZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.32%0.34%0.36%0.45%0.56%0.32%0.34%0.79%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBOD.L and BOTZ.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTZ.L.

RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.50% for BOTZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOD.L and BOTZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer