BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BOTZ.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ROBG.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) are both Robotics funds - BOTZ.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index while ROBG.L tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOTZ.L returned 6.51%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for ROBG.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTZ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ROBG.L.

Performance

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BOTZ.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ.L achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly lower than ROBG.L's 16.62% return.

BOTZ.L

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -6.69%
• 6M: -6.46%
• YTD: -2.78%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 6.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROBG.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -5.20%
• 6M: 10.22%
• YTD: 16.62%
• 1Y: 34.55%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: 5.16%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOTZ.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc	-2.78%	13.45%	13.02%	40.20%	-42.86%	-5.58%
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	16.62%	23.33%	-1.71%	24.60%	-33.82%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ.L and ROBG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.87

The correlation between BOTZ.L and ROBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ.L

BOTZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BOTZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BOTZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

ROBG.L

ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTZ.L	ROBG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	1.37	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	2.00	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.25	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	2.14	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	7.08	-5.51

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ.L and ROBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ.L drawdown since its inception was -53.16%, which is greater than ROBG.L's maximum drawdown of -50.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ.L and ROBG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ.L	ROBG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.16%	-50.44%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.87%	-16.08%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.07%	-29.08%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.07%	-10.38%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.05%	-20.02%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	4.87%	+1.70%

Volatility

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) is 8.94%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that BOTZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ.L	ROBG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	10.18%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.81%	20.78%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.02%	25.14%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.47%	26.94%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.47%	23.86%	+2.61%

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOTZ.L nor ROBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ.L and ROBG.L in my portfolio?

BOTZ.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ.L or ROBG.L?

On fees, BOTZ.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ.L or ROBG.L?

BOTZ.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.

What is the main difference between BOTZ.L and ROBG.L?

BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTZ.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.