PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOTZ.L is traded in USD, while DRVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DRVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ.L achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly lower than DRVG.L's 20.29% return.


BOTZ.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-6.69%
6M
-6.46%
YTD
-2.78%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
10Y*

DRVG.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
-11.80%
6M
10.94%
YTD
20.29%
1Y
47.40%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
-2.78%13.45%13.02%40.20%-42.86%-5.58%
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
20.29%29.63%-5.03%26.84%-33.96%-28.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ.L and DRVG.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.79

The correlation between BOTZ.L and DRVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ.L
BOTZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DRVG.L
DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZ.LDRVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.77

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

8.63

-7.06

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ.L and DRVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ.L drawdown since its inception was -53.16%, smaller than the maximum DRVG.L drawdown of -56.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ.L and DRVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZ.LDRVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.16%

-56.23%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-17.00%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.07%

-33.57%

+4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.07%

-16.03%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-38.64%

+15.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

5.48%

+1.09%

Volatility

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) is 8.94%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that BOTZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZ.LDRVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

10.13%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

21.44%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.02%

26.49%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

30.02%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

30.02%

-3.55%

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTZ.L and DRVG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

BOTZ.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.63%0.94%1.38%0.83%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ.L and DRVG.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTZ.L and DRVG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

BOTZ.L is categorized as Robotics, while DRVG.L is Technology Equities. BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ.L and DRVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer