RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L
RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and ROBG.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) are both Robotics funds - RBOD.L tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics while ROBG.L tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOD.L returned 10.77%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for ROBG.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ROBG.L.
Performance
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOD.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RBOD.L having a 29.09% return and ROBG.L slightly lower at 27.71%.
RBOD.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 29.09%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 46.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBG.L
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 27.71%
- 6M
- 26.40%
- 1Y
- 56.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.09% | 17.09% | 5.85% | 39.67% | -34.48% | 20.91% | 39.70% | 38.35% | -19.53% | 2.90% |
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 27.71% | 23.33% | -1.71% | 24.60% | -33.82% | 15.99% | 45.19% | 30.37% | -21.35% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOD.L and ROBG.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RBOD.L and ROBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
Industrials
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
Healthcare
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
Basic Materials
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
Communication Services
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
Consumer Defensive
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
-
Energy
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
-
Financial Services
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
-
Real Estate
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
-
Utilities
RBOD.L
-
ROBG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOD.L
ROBG.L
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBOD.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.47 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 13.58 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBOD.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.47 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, roughly equal to the maximum ROBG.L drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and ROBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOD.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -43.06% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -16.08% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | -27.75% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.50% | -43.06% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.86% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -13.32% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 4.12% | +0.37% |
Volatility
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) have volatilities of 8.26% and 8.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOD.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 8.18% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | 17.51% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 22.60% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 22.88% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 21.77% | +1.84% |
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison
RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ROBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.79% | 1.18% |
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOD.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.
RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOD.L and ROBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer