PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOD.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RBOD.L having a 29.09% return and ROBG.L slightly lower at 27.71%.


RBOD.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
8.12%
YTD
29.09%
6M
27.09%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*

ROBG.L

1D
-1.48%
1M
8.38%
YTD
27.71%
6M
26.40%
1Y
56.11%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.09%17.09%5.85%39.67%-34.48%20.91%39.70%38.35%-19.53%2.90%
ROBG.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
27.71%23.33%-1.71%24.60%-33.82%15.99%45.19%30.37%-21.35%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and ROBG.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017

0.90

The correlation between RBOD.L and ROBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RBOD.L
ROBG.L

Technology

71.4%
45.5%

Industrials

26.2%
45.6%

Healthcare

1.5%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
2.9%

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RBOD.L
71.4%
ROBG.L
45.5%

Industrials

RBOD.L
26.2%
ROBG.L
45.6%

Healthcare

RBOD.L
1.5%
ROBG.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

RBOD.L
0.1%
ROBG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

RBOD.L
0.1%
ROBG.L
2.9%

Communication Services

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Energy

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Financial Services

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Real Estate

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Utilities

RBOD.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L
RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBG.L
ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBOD.LROBG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.47

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

13.58

-3.29

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and ROBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBOD.LROBG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.47

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.31

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, roughly equal to the maximum ROBG.L drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and ROBG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBOD.LROBG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.50%

-43.06%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-16.08%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-27.75%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.50%

-43.06%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.86%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-13.32%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

4.12%

+0.37%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) have volatilities of 8.26% and 8.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBOD.LROBG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

8.18%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

17.51%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

22.60%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.72%

22.88%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.61%

21.77%

+1.84%

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBOD.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ROBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.27%0.34%0.36%0.45%0.56%0.32%0.34%0.79%1.18%
ROBG.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBOD.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.

RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOD.L and ROBG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer