RBOD.L vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
RBOD.L and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RBOD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 19, 2017. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both RBOD.L and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RBOD.L or FNGS.
Performance
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 40.12% return.
RBOD.L
3.75%
1.67%
2.64%
19.01%
10.80%
N/A
FNGS
40.12%
2.96%
17.64%
49.04%
33.45%
N/A
Key characteristics
| RBOD.L | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.98 | 1.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.42 | 2.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.85 | 2.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.50 | 8.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.11% | 5.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.36% | 24.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.50% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.59% | -2.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between RBOD.L and FNGS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.79% | 1.17% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RBOD.L vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) is 4.87%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that RBOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.