RBOD.L vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Robotics funds - RBOD.L tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics while BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOD.L returned 10.77%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 29.09% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 4.83% return.

RBOD.L

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 29.09%
• 6M: 26.94%
• 1Y: 45.41%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 22.24%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: 1.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	29.09%	17.09%	5.85%	39.67%	-34.48%	20.91%	39.70%	38.35%	-19.53%	2.90%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	4.83%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017	0.66

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RBOD.L	BOTZ
Technology	71.4%	31.8%
Industrials	26.2%	48.6%
Healthcare	1.5%	9.0%
Basic Materials	0.1%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	6.1%
Communication Services	-	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L

RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 61
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 26
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBOD.L	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	0.91	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	1.42	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.17	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	1.16	+1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.29	3.94	+6.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBOD.L	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	0.91	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.07	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.42	+0.14

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBOD.L	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.50%	-55.54%	+11.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.42%	-19.34%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	-29.02%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.50%	-55.54%	+11.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-8.77%	+8.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-18.31%	+6.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	5.66%	-1.17%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) is 8.26%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that RBOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBOD.L	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.26%	9.02%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	19.19%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.76%	24.56%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.72%	26.82%	-3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.61%	25.77%	-2.16%

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOD.L vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.62%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	0.27%	0.34%	0.36%	0.45%	0.56%	0.32%	0.34%	0.79%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBOD.L and BOTZ in my portfolio?

RBOD.L and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBOD.L or BOTZ?

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBOD.L or BOTZ?

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between RBOD.L and BOTZ?

RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.68% for BOTZ.