RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Robotics funds - RBOD.L tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics while BOTG.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RBOD.L returned 16.38%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for BOTG.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BOTG.L.

Performance

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RBOD.L is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -6.42% return.

RBOD.L

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -8.78%
• 6M: 13.62%
• YTD: 19.47%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: —

BOTG.L

• 1D: -3.74%
• 1M: -9.13%
• 6M: -10.88%
• YTD: -6.42%
• 1Y: 3.07%
• 3Y*: 4.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	19.47%	17.05%	5.93%	39.67%	-34.54%	-1.51%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-6.42%	13.42%	13.09%	39.59%	-42.85%	-29.45%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTG.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.85

The correlation between RBOD.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RBOD.L	BOTG.L
Technology	71.1%	41.2%
Industrials	25.5%	48.1%
Healthcare	2.8%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	0.7%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.3%
Communication Services	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L

RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBOD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.11	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	0.37	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.04	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	0.15	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	0.39	+5.08

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -65.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBOD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.47%	-65.02%	+20.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.38%	-21.07%	+5.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.00%	-28.56%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.23%	-32.55%	+21.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-41.82%	+29.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	7.86%	-3.08%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) have volatilities of 10.23% and 10.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBOD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.23%	10.15%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.00%	23.47%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.76%	28.10%	-2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	31.32%	-6.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.71%	31.32%	-7.61%

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOD.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than BOTG.L's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.16%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	0.32%	0.34%	0.36%	0.45%	0.56%	0.32%	0.34%	0.79%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBOD.L and BOTG.L in my portfolio?

RBOD.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBOD.L or BOTG.L?

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBOD.L or BOTG.L?

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTG.L.

What is the main difference between RBOD.L and BOTG.L?

RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.