PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L).

BOTG.L and FGQD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOTG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. FGQD.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. Both BOTG.L and FGQD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing		-4.86%5.46%14.97%32.61%-36.00%-6.41%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF		1.77%11.78%13.21%11.51%-0.25%2.29%
Different Trading Currencies

BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 1.77% return.

BOTG.L

1D
4.00%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FGQD.L

1D
1.53%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
1.77%
6M
5.42%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF

Often compared with BOTG.L:
BOTG.L vs. BOTZBOTG.L vs. RBTX.LBOTG.L vs. SCHGBOTG.L vs. FUQA.LBOTG.L vs. QTUMBOTG.L vs. SMGB.LBOTG.L vs. XLKQ.L
Often compared with FGQD.L:
FGQD.L vs. GGRP.LFGQD.L vs. SCHDFGQD.L vs. IMID.LFGQD.L vs. GGRG.LFGQD.L vs. TDIV.ASFGQD.L vs. XDEB.DEFGQD.L vs. FUSD.L

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF

Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BOTG.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

1.38

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

1.84

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.52

-1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.87

9.89

-7.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and FGQD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BOTG.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.38

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.88

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.80

-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and FGQD.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FGQD.L's 1.81% yield.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing		0.26%0.27%0.24%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF		1.81%1.87%2.31%2.78%2.69%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.56%

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than FGQD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and FGQD.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

BOTG.LFGQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-26.43%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.19%

-10.57%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-16.90%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-4.12%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.84%

-2.94%

-16.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

1.77%

+4.07%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that BOTG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

BOTG.LFGQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

3.39%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.74%

7.05%

+9.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.87%

13.16%

+23.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.03%

12.16%

+15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.03%

14.72%

+13.31%