PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTG.L vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-6.24%5.46%14.97%32.61%-36.00%-6.41%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
2.36%26.92%53.17%32.87%-20.34%-1.66%
Different Trading Currencies

BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 2.36% return.


BOTG.L

1D
-1.45%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
-6.24%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
1.23%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
2.36%
6M
3.03%
1Y
44.99%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTG.LQTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

1.55

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

2.17

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.43

-2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.76

10.54

-6.78

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and QTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTG.LQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.55

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.87

-0.96

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and QTUM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than QTUM's 1.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.26%0.27%0.24%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.07%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -29.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and QTUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTG.LQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-38.45%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.19%

-15.26%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.02%

-8.79%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.83%

-8.40%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

4.40%

+1.49%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) have volatilities of 8.73% and 8.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOTG.LQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

8.66%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

19.99%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.90%

29.23%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.02%

24.30%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.02%

25.74%

+2.28%