RBLY vs. CONY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

RBLY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -40.88% return, which is significantly lower than CONY's -30.21% return.

RBLY

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: -40.88%
• 6M: -41.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -4.67%
• 1M: -15.89%
• YTD: -30.21%
• 6M: -33.56%
• 1Y: -54.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	-40.88%	-26.39%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-30.21%	-38.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and CONY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

RBLY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBLY	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.37	—

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLY	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.96%	-63.57%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-63.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.45%	-60.46%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.83%	-22.89%	-11.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBLY	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.82%	57.96%	-5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.82%	59.92%	-7.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.82%	59.92%	-7.10%

RBLY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RBLY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

RBLY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 125.96%, less than CONY's 215.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	215.02%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	125.96%	36.84%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLY and CONY in my portfolio?

RBLY and CONY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBLY or CONY?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLY or CONY?

RBLY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLY or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 215.02%, compared with 125.96% for RBLY.