PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -34.96% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,090.11% return.


RBLY

1D
-4.33%
1M
7.84%
6M
-36.31%
YTD
-34.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWET

1D
-0.33%
1M
17.22%
6M
619.17%
YTD
1,090.11%
1Y
1,898.00%
3Y*
125.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
-34.96%-26.39%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
1,090.11%76.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and BWET is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLY vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLYBWETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

46.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

176.08

RBLY vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-56.90%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.69%

-10.91%

-47.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.31%

-23.65%

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

Volatility

RBLY vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.89%

107.50%

-53.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.89%

74.64%

-20.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.89%

74.64%

-20.75%

RBLY vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLY vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 128.92%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
128.92%36.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and BWET have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 128.92%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 3.50% for BWET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer