RBLU vs. HDV
RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RBLU returned -87.47% vs 22.15% for HDV. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RBLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
RBLU vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -79.38% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 13.48% return.
RBLU
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -79.38%
- 6M
- -85.52%
- 1Y
- -87.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 22.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
RBLU vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | -79.38% | 16.20% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 13.48% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLU and HDV is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLU vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
RBLU
HDV
RBLU vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.39 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 4.30 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 11.97 | -13.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 2.29 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.73 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
RBLU vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.59%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.59% | -37.04% | -57.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.59% | -5.18% | -89.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.24% | -1.86% | -92.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.04% | -3.09% | -39.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.97% | 1.86% | +60.11% |
Volatility
RBLU vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a higher volatility of 34.21% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.23%. This indicates that RBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.21% | 3.23% | +30.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 98.98% | 7.54% | +91.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.35% | 9.75% | +109.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.02% | 12.82% | +104.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.02% | 15.73% | +101.29% |
RBLU vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBLU vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than HDV's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.89% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | 6.28% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLU and HDV have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBLU has higher volatility (34.21%) compared to HDV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLU dropped -94.59% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, HDV leads with 22.15% vs -87.47% for RBLU. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDV has performed better with a 22.15% return vs -87.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.
RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 2.89% for HDV.
RBLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. RBLU tracks Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLU and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer